Serveur d'exploration sur le peuplier

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Structural evaluation and bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with biodegraded triploid poplar.

Identifieur interne : 002478 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002477; suivant : 002479

Structural evaluation and bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with biodegraded triploid poplar.

Auteurs : Kun Wang [République populaire de Chine] ; Haiyan Yang ; Wei Wang ; Run-Cang Sun

Source :

RBID : pubmed:23517540

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pretreatment is a key step to decrease the recalcitrance of lignocelluloses and then increase the digestibility of cellulose in second-generation bioethanol production. In this study, wood chips from triploid poplar were biopretreated with white rot fungus Trametes velutina D10149. The effects of incubation duration on delignification efficiency and structural modification of cellulose were comparably studied, as well as the digestibility of cellulose by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF).

RESULTS

Although microbial pretreatments did not significantly introduce lignin degradation, the data from SSF exhibited higher cellulose conversion (21-75% for biopretreated samples for 4-16 weeks) as compared to the untreated poplar (18%). In spite of the essential maintain of crystallinity, the modification of lignin structure during fungal treatment undoubtedly played a key role in improving cellulose bioconversion rates. Finally, the ethanol concentration of 5.16 g/L was detected in the fermentation broth from the cellulosic sample biodegraded for 16 weeks after 24 h SSF, achieving 34.8% cellulose utilization in poplar.

CONCLUSION

The potential fungal pretreatment with Trametes velutina D10149 was firstly explored in this study. It is found that the biopretreatment process had a significant effect on the digestibility of substrate probably due to the removal and unit variation of lignin, since the crystallinities of substrates were rarely changed. Additional investigation is still required especially to improve the selectivity for lignin degradation and optimize the digestibility of cellulose.


DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-42
PubMed: 23517540
PubMed Central: PMC3639831


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Structural evaluation and bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with biodegraded triploid poplar.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wang, Kun" sort="Wang, Kun" uniqKey="Wang K" first="Kun" last="Wang">Kun Wang</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<nlm:affiliation>Institute of Biomass Chemistry and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China. rcsun3@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Institute of Biomass Chemistry and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Pékin</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yang, Haiyan" sort="Yang, Haiyan" uniqKey="Yang H" first="Haiyan" last="Yang">Haiyan Yang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wang, Wei" sort="Wang, Wei" uniqKey="Wang W" first="Wei" last="Wang">Wei Wang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sun, Run Cang" sort="Sun, Run Cang" uniqKey="Sun R" first="Run-Cang" last="Sun">Run-Cang Sun</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:23517540</idno>
<idno type="pmid">23517540</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1186/1754-6834-6-42</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC3639831</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002657</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002657</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002657</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002657</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002657</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Structural evaluation and bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with biodegraded triploid poplar.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wang, Kun" sort="Wang, Kun" uniqKey="Wang K" first="Kun" last="Wang">Kun Wang</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<nlm:affiliation>Institute of Biomass Chemistry and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China. rcsun3@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Institute of Biomass Chemistry and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Pékin</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yang, Haiyan" sort="Yang, Haiyan" uniqKey="Yang H" first="Haiyan" last="Yang">Haiyan Yang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wang, Wei" sort="Wang, Wei" uniqKey="Wang W" first="Wei" last="Wang">Wei Wang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sun, Run Cang" sort="Sun, Run Cang" uniqKey="Sun R" first="Run-Cang" last="Sun">Run-Cang Sun</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Biotechnology for biofuels</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1754-6834</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2013" type="published">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>BACKGROUND</b>
</p>
<p>Pretreatment is a key step to decrease the recalcitrance of lignocelluloses and then increase the digestibility of cellulose in second-generation bioethanol production. In this study, wood chips from triploid poplar were biopretreated with white rot fungus Trametes velutina D10149. The effects of incubation duration on delignification efficiency and structural modification of cellulose were comparably studied, as well as the digestibility of cellulose by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF).</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>RESULTS</b>
</p>
<p>Although microbial pretreatments did not significantly introduce lignin degradation, the data from SSF exhibited higher cellulose conversion (21-75% for biopretreated samples for 4-16 weeks) as compared to the untreated poplar (18%). In spite of the essential maintain of crystallinity, the modification of lignin structure during fungal treatment undoubtedly played a key role in improving cellulose bioconversion rates. Finally, the ethanol concentration of 5.16 g/L was detected in the fermentation broth from the cellulosic sample biodegraded for 16 weeks after 24 h SSF, achieving 34.8% cellulose utilization in poplar.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>CONCLUSION</b>
</p>
<p>The potential fungal pretreatment with Trametes velutina D10149 was firstly explored in this study. It is found that the biopretreatment process had a significant effect on the digestibility of substrate probably due to the removal and unit variation of lignin, since the crystallinities of substrates were rarely changed. Additional investigation is still required especially to improve the selectivity for lignin degradation and optimize the digestibility of cellulose.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">23517540</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>29</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">1754-6834</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>Mar</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Biotechnology for biofuels</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Biotechnol Biofuels</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Structural evaluation and bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with biodegraded triploid poplar.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>42</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1186/1754-6834-6-42</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Pretreatment is a key step to decrease the recalcitrance of lignocelluloses and then increase the digestibility of cellulose in second-generation bioethanol production. In this study, wood chips from triploid poplar were biopretreated with white rot fungus Trametes velutina D10149. The effects of incubation duration on delignification efficiency and structural modification of cellulose were comparably studied, as well as the digestibility of cellulose by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF).</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Although microbial pretreatments did not significantly introduce lignin degradation, the data from SSF exhibited higher cellulose conversion (21-75% for biopretreated samples for 4-16 weeks) as compared to the untreated poplar (18%). In spite of the essential maintain of crystallinity, the modification of lignin structure during fungal treatment undoubtedly played a key role in improving cellulose bioconversion rates. Finally, the ethanol concentration of 5.16 g/L was detected in the fermentation broth from the cellulosic sample biodegraded for 16 weeks after 24 h SSF, achieving 34.8% cellulose utilization in poplar.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The potential fungal pretreatment with Trametes velutina D10149 was firstly explored in this study. It is found that the biopretreatment process had a significant effect on the digestibility of substrate probably due to the removal and unit variation of lignin, since the crystallinities of substrates were rarely changed. Additional investigation is still required especially to improve the selectivity for lignin degradation and optimize the digestibility of cellulose.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Wang</LastName>
<ForeName>Kun</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Institute of Biomass Chemistry and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China. rcsun3@bjfu.edu.cn.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Yang</LastName>
<ForeName>Haiyan</ForeName>
<Initials>H</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Wang</LastName>
<ForeName>Wei</ForeName>
<Initials>W</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Sun</LastName>
<ForeName>Run-Cang</ForeName>
<Initials>RC</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>Biotechnol Biofuels</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101316935</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1754-6834</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23517540</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">1754-6834-6-42</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/1754-6834-6-42</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3639831</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Microbiol. 2005 Dec;43(6):487-92</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16410763</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Biomacromolecules. 2011 May 9;12(5):1610-20</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21405063</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Jun 16;52(12):3713-20</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15186087</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Vis Exp. 2010 Mar 11;(37):null</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20224547</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2013 Feb;130:578-83</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23334013</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Biotechnol Prog. 2003 Jul-Aug;19(4):1109-17</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12892470</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000 Spring;84-86:5-37</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10849776</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jun;22(6):695-700</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15122302</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2011 Nov;102(21):9942-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21903385</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Jul 1;103(4):715-24</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19337984</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Biodegradation. 2011 Jul;22(4):797-804</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20711746</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Enzyme Microb Technol. 2011 Dec 10;49(6-7):492-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22142723</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Int Microbiol. 2002 Jun;5(2):53-63</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12180781</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(8):2280-4</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16593451</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Apr 5;86(1):88-95</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15007845</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Dec;81(3):399-417</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18810426</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Biotechnol Adv. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6):675-85</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21624451</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2009 May;100(9):2580-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19157872</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Jul;25(7):759-61</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17572667</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2008 Nov;99(17):8512-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18448331</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2009 Nov;100(21):5288-94</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19502052</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2009 Oct;100(20):4829-35</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19450975</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jul;116:99-106</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22609662</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2003 Spring;105 -108:27-41</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12721473</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2010 Aug;101(15):6045-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20307975</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>République populaire de Chine</li>
</country>
<settlement>
<li>Pékin</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Sun, Run Cang" sort="Sun, Run Cang" uniqKey="Sun R" first="Run-Cang" last="Sun">Run-Cang Sun</name>
<name sortKey="Wang, Wei" sort="Wang, Wei" uniqKey="Wang W" first="Wei" last="Wang">Wei Wang</name>
<name sortKey="Yang, Haiyan" sort="Yang, Haiyan" uniqKey="Yang H" first="Haiyan" last="Yang">Haiyan Yang</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="République populaire de Chine">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Wang, Kun" sort="Wang, Kun" uniqKey="Wang K" first="Kun" last="Wang">Kun Wang</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002478 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002478 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PoplarV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:23517540
   |texte=   Structural evaluation and bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with biodegraded triploid poplar.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:23517540" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 12:07:19 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 12:16:31 2020